~/coco $ compare

git-coco vs OpenCommit vs aicommits

All three write your commit messages with AI — and they're good at it. That part is table stakes now. The real question is what you want around the commit. OpenCommit and aicommits are focused, single-purpose tools. git-coco is an AI git toolbelt: commits, changelogs, review, and PR/MR creation, in a terminal workstation that works on GitHub and GitLab.

Capabilitygit-cocoOpenCommitaicommits
AI commit messages
Conventional Commitsvia flag
commitlint validation + retry
Local models (Ollama)aicommits is OpenAI-oriented; its sibling aicommit2 adds Ollama.
Multiple AI providers7severallimited
Changelog generation
AI code review (CI-gateable)
Commit splitting
PR / MR creation from diff
Terminal workstation (TUI)
GitLab / GitHub Enterprise triage
Open source (MIT)

Comparison reflects each tool's primary, documented CLI as of June 2026. Tools evolve quickly — corrections welcome via an issue.

Which should you pick?

They aim at different things. Here's the honest version.

aicommits

You want the absolute simplest thing: a tiny, focused CLI / git hook that writes a commit message and nothing else. Minimalism is the point.

OpenCommit

You want a popular, well-supported commit-message tool with emoji and a GitHub Action, and you live on GitHub. It does its one job well.

git-coco

You want AI across the whole workflow — commits, changelogs, review, PR/MR — in one tool, a keyboard-driven workstation to run it from, and/or you're on GitLab or GitHub Enterprise. Breadth and multi-forge are the point.

Try the toolbelt.

One command installs and configures everything — pick a provider (including local Ollama) and go.

npx git-coco@latest init